Content

First failed benchmark
Some BNN benchmark examples are applied to socalled trivial data. Under trivial we mean an elementary
and most common cases when observed outputs or targets have a bell shape distribution density. Most publicly available
data sets have this sort of distributions and building
stochastic models for this kind of data is elementary, not challenging and can be accomplished in many different ways,
including making ensembes by simple random initialization. The claimed advantage of BNN is recognition
of nontrivial distributions of the outputs. In this experiment I simply took popular
published BNN example and changed the data from trivial bell shape distribution into other.
Benchmark code and benchmark data
Here we consider benchmark example from the site specifically designed and dedicated to probabilistic models.
Example: Bayesian Neural Network.
The training data is stochastic function of a single argument $y = F(x)$. The training record has
100 pairs, shown in the image below by 'x':
When library code is executed, it returns expectation model, shown as a solid blue line, and
light blue area holding 90% confidence interval. It returns also reference to an object that generates
Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples of the output for any provided input $x$. I generated multiple samples
with 2000 returned values, passed them to a method building a histogram and obtained perfectly matched
distribution of the outputs, below is one of them:
At this point I have to add that outputs were truly generated with normal distribution, it can be found in code,
and the result perfectly matches the actual distibution. Here we say a 'good job' to the developers of software and
try our own data.
Moving from ideal world into real one
Now we try to use this NUMPYRO example for the data that developer of this
code have not seen.
It is just a real life situation, not an attack. I only split data randomly into two blocks changing the distribution from
unimodal into multimodal:
The expectation and confidence interval looks fine but the histogram is disappointing. It shows unimodal distribution
for every point I tried. It appeared that mathematical software, for which authors introduced a special term
'probabilistic programming' did not recognize the basic property of the data
that can be seen by the naked eye.
In case if referred site move or remove this example, it can be found in my repository
github. The changes that I made to
the code are properly commented, so they can be disabled and code may be executed for both
original and modified data.
 
